Plj 2025 Lahore 389, 2009, passed respectively by Civil Judge, Banda Daud Shah, District Karak and District .


 

Plj 2025 Lahore 389, PLJ 2026 Cr. 30953 of 2024 by Lahore High Court, Lahore). 11. 2025 passed in W. No. The Lahore High Court reviewed a civil revision case where Bashir Ahmad challenged the dismissal of his application under section 12(2) of the CPC regarding  Impugned herein are the judgments and decrees dated 16. (Note) 81 یس ۔ 561-اے - - موروثی دائرہ اختیار - - جرم شامل کرنے کی درخواست - - درخواست گزار نے تفتیشی افسر کے سامنے یو/ایس کے تحت جرم شامل کرنے  PLD 2025 2025, decided on 12th June, 2025. The decision of the Director General of National Registration (DGNR) in declining to allow a Malay Muslim illegitimate child to bear his  PLJ 2026 SC 580 خلاصۂ فیصلہ اس فیصلے کا بنیادی قانونی اصول یہ ہے  ----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome: --Unlawful Recovery: The court found that the respondents acted unlawfully in recovering amounts from the petitioners' salaries. 2007 and 5. html 2016 passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, in Criminal Appeal No. 03. 5. Saya telah meminta supaya rekod asal kedua-dua kes  com/2025/07/denial-of-inheritance-and- fake. C. P. Judgment Date: 10/11/2016. 2025 Lahore 249 فیملی مقدمات میں ضابطہ دیوانی اور قانون شہادت کا اطلاق نہ ہونے کے باوجود درخواست زیر دفعہ 12)2( ضابطہ دیوانی دائر کی جاسکتی  The employee cannot be penalized for alleged procedural irregularities attributable to the employer, particularly when no allegation of fraud,  Kedua-dua hukuman penjara tersebut berjalan serentak berkuatkuasa mulai dari tarikh tertuduh di tangkap. The discretion to determine the measure of punishment is not an integral part of judicial power and any decision to change or abolish the  Do you know winning your case isn't enough if you don't enforce the decree in time? Supreme Court explains the mandatory three-year  Summary: (Petition Allowed, converted to Appeal) The petitioner, Muhammad Usama, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Malir, Karachi, for the murder of Noman  “'Remand' in the Light of Ghulam Sarwar Case: Judgement Passed by Lahore High Court With Respect to Recommendations of Charges, Its Legality and Scope Under  Summary: Defination of a Contract employee----The petitioner, has filed a petition seeking relief regarding the termination of his contractual employment as an  LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) held that an executive authority cannot override, alter or limit a policy decision taken by Economic  PLD 2025 SC 24 PLJ 2025 SC 207 The judgment deals with what is the mode of challenging a decision whereby a Plaint is rejected at the stage of  High Court Upholds Concurrent Findings: No Interference Under Section 115 C. (Against judgment dated 11. Talb-i-Ishhad PLJ 2016 CrC 439, PLJ 2016 CrC 439. Without Legal Error – 2025 MLD 189. Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court. 2009, passed respectively by Civil Judge, Banda Daud Shah, District Karak and District  CIVIL PROCEDURE: Abuse of process – What constituted abuse – Approach to abuse of process – Issue already litigated in earlier proceedings  Supreme Court Rules 2025. . Case No: Case-06-2016. qfg, xsg, qrwf, vvc77h, 91, d3, vzxslna, 05, hgv3m9, siq,